Product comparison · 2 laptop cases

Golla Sleeve Metro Neoprene vs HP Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24)

15specifications compared
10differ
5identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

Maximum screen size
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:35.6 cm (14")
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):35.8 cm (14.1")
Material
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:Neoprene
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):Polyester
Brand compatibility
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:Universal
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):HP
Protection features
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:Scratch resistant
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):Water resistant
Width
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:260 mm
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):250 mm
Depth
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:30 mm
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):22 mm
Height
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:400 mm
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):360 mm
Weight
- Sleeve Metro Neoprene:333 g
- Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24):320 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 601651, Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24)
37 specifications	A Golla Sleeve Metro Neoprene Model 601651 View product	B HP Renew Business 14.1 Sleeve (Bulk Qty. 24)View product
Features5 differ
Surface coloration	Monochromatic	Monochromatic
Maximum screen sizeDiffers	35.6 cm (14")	35.8 cm (14.1")
Case type	Sleeve case	Sleeve case
MaterialDiffers	Neoprene	Polyester
Product main colour	Black	Black
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Universal	HP
CompatibilityDiffers	Fits Macbook Pro 14" and smaller laptops.	Fits most 14.1-inch diagonal laptops.
Number of compartmentsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Tablet compartmentKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protection featuresDiffers	Scratch resistant	Water resistant
Closure typeKnown for one	Zipper	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of origin	China	China
QuantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Colour nameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
HP segmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Business
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	260 mm	250 mm
DepthDiffers	30 mm	22 mm
HeightDiffers	400 mm	360 mm
WeightDiffers	333 g	320 g
Package volumeKnown for one	3120 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weight	370 g	370 g
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	250 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	360 mm
Technical detailsidentical
Care informationKnown for one	Wipe with damp cloth and lukewarm water. To keep the leather fresh you can use a leather balm regularly.	Unknown — not stated by the source
Combined Nomenclature (CN) codeKnown for one	42029209	Unknown — not stated by the source
Box contentsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	HP Renew Business 14.1-inch Laptop Sleeve; Documentation
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	4202929890	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one	200 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	20 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	133.8 kg
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	133.4 kg (294 lbs)
Other features1 differ
UNSPSC-codeDiffers	43191629.0	53121706
Water-resistantKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LDPE bag contains 100% recycled plastic; Hanger tag is made from 100% recycled paper stock; 100% ocean-bound plastic
Sustainability complianceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laptop case comparisons

All laptop case comparisons