Product comparison · 2 laminators

HP OneLam 270 A4 vs Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4

9specifications compared
4differ
5identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 has 38 mm more width than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (370 mm vs 332 mm). The Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 has 5 mm more depth than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (125 mm vs 120 mm). The Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 has 19 mm more height than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (82 mm vs 63 mm). Weight: 940 g on the HP OneLam 270 A4, 1.41 kg on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4.

Width
- OneLam 270 A4:332 mm
- iLAM Laminator Home A4:370 mm
Depth
- OneLam 270 A4:120 mm
- iLAM Laminator Home A4:125 mm
Height
- OneLam 270 A4:63 mm
- iLAM Laminator Home A4:82 mm
Weight
- OneLam 270 A4:940 g
- iLAM Laminator Home A4:1.41 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of OneLam 270 A4, iLAM Laminator Home A4
34 specifications	A HP OneLam 270 A4 View product	B Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 View product
Featuresidentical
Type	Hot laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination widthKnown for one	23 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Preheating timeKnown for one	4 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Lamination speedKnown for one	270 mm/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum film thicknessKnown for one	80 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum film thicknessKnown for one	125 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum document thicknessKnown for one	0.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in display	No	No
Warm-up timeKnown for one	4 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Format	A4	A4
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Temperature (max)Known for one	120 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colour	Grey, White	Grey, White
Indication light	Yes	Yes
Easy to useKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ready indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Reverse motor functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum pouch thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 µm
Maximum pouch thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 µm
Lamination systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pouch
Laminating timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 s
Number of rollersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	GS, TUV, CE
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	230 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 - 60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	332 mm	370 mm
DepthDiffers	120 mm	125 mm
HeightDiffers	63 mm	82 mm
WeightDiffers	940 g	1.41 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	369 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	74 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	138 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	1.22 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons