Product comparison · 2 laminators

HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator vs Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3

25specifications compared
18differ
7identical
16known for one product only

Key differences

The Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 has 10 cm more maximum lamination width than the HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator (33 cm vs 23 cm). The Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 has 100 mm/min more lamination speed than the HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator (500 mm/min vs 400 mm/min). The HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator has 45 µm more maximum film thickness than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 (125 µm vs 80 µm). Format: A4 on the HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator, A3 on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3. Product colour: White on the HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator, Silver, White on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3.

Maximum lamination width
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:23 cm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:33 cm
Lamination speed
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:400 mm/min
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:500 mm/min
Maximum film thickness
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:125 µm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:80 µm
Warm-up time
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:4 min
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:1 min
Format
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:A4
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:A3
Temperature (max)
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:150 °C
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:143 °C
Product colour
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:White
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:Silver, White
Power consumption (typical)
- 3160 laminator Hot laminator:400 W
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:1400 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 3160, iLAM Laminator Office A3
41 specifications	A HP 3160 laminator Hot laminator Model 3160 View product	B Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 View product
Features7 differ
Type	Hot laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination widthDiffers	23 cm	33 cm
Lamination speedDiffers	400 mm/min	500 mm/min
Minimum film thicknessKnown for one	75 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum film thicknessDiffers	125 µm	80 µm
Minimum pouch thickness	75 µm	75 µm
Maximum pouch thickness	125 µm	125 µm
Maximum document thickness	0.5 mm	0.5 mm
Built-in display	No	No
Lamination system	Pouch	Pouch
Number of rollers	2	2
Warm-up timeDiffers	4 min	1 min
FormatDiffers	A4	A3
Temperature (max)Differs	150 °C	143 °C
Product colourDiffers	White	Silver, White
Control typeKnown for one	Buttons	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto standbyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power off afterKnown for one	30 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ready indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Preheating timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 min
Laminating timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36 s
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Indication lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	GS, TUV, CE
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	400 W	1400 W
AC input frequencyDiffers	50 Hz	50/60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	220 - 240 V	220-240 V
CurrentKnown for one	1.74 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	380 mm	470 mm
DepthDiffers	123 mm	144 mm
HeightDiffers	81 mm	102 mm
WeightDiffers	1.35 kg	1.74 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	195 mm	230 mm
Package depthDiffers	418 mm	565 mm
Package heightDiffers	120 mm	350 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.7 kg	2.2 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Laminator pouch includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of laminator pouchesKnown for one	15	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84729080
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons