Product comparison · 2 laminators

Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator vs Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3

17specifications compared
14differ
3identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator has 1 cm more maximum lamination width than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 (34 cm vs 33 cm). The Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator has 3 min more preheating time than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 (4 min vs 1 min). The Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 has 250 mm/min more lamination speed than the Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator (500 mm/min vs 250 mm/min). Type: Cold/hot laminator on the Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator, Hot laminator on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3. Product colour: Black on the Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator, Silver, White on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3.

Type
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:Cold/hot laminator
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:Hot laminator
Maximum lamination width
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:34 cm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:33 cm
Preheating time
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:4 min
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:1 min
Lamination speed
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:250 mm/min
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:500 mm/min
Minimum pouch thickness
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:80 µm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:75 µm
Maximum document thickness
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:0.6 mm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:0.5 mm
Product colour
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:Black
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:Silver, White
Width
- 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator:440 mm
- iLAM Laminator Office A3:470 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00050562, iLAM Laminator Office A3
34 specifications	A Hama 00050562 laminator Cold/hot laminator Model 00050562 View product	B Leitz iLAM Laminator Office A3 View product
Features7 differ
TypeDiffers	Cold/hot laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination widthDiffers	34 cm	33 cm
Preheating timeDiffers	4 min	1 min
Lamination speedDiffers	250 mm/min	500 mm/min
Maximum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 µm
Minimum pouch thicknessDiffers	80 µm	75 µm
Maximum document thicknessDiffers	0.6 mm	0.5 mm
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Lamination systemKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Pouch
Laminating timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36 s
Warm-up timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 min
Temperature (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	143 °C
Product colourDiffers	Black	Silver, White
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Indication lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	GS, TUV, CE
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1400 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	440 mm	470 mm
DepthDiffers	140 mm	144 mm
HeightDiffers	65 mm	102 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.74 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	465 mm	230 mm
Package depthDiffers	160 mm	565 mm
Package heightDiffers	75 mm	350 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.66 kg	2.2 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84729080
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Packaging contentidentical
Laminator pouch includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of laminator pouchesKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons