Product comparison · 2 laminators

GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload vs Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 1identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload has 90 mm more width than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 (460 mm vs 370 mm). The GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload has 305 mm more depth than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 (430 mm vs 125 mm). The GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload has 148 mm more height than the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4 (230 mm vs 82 mm). Format: A3 on the GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload, A4 on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4. Product colour: Black, Blue on the GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload, Grey, White on the Leitz iLAM Laminator Home A4.

  • Format
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:A3
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:A4
  • Product colour
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:Black, Blue
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:Grey, White
  • Width
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:460 mm
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:370 mm
  • Depth
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:430 mm
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:125 mm
  • Height
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:230 mm
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:82 mm
  • Weight
    • RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:17 kg
    • iLAM Laminator Home A4:1.41 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload, iLAM Laminator Home A4
26 specifications
Features2 differ
Maximum lamination widthKnown for one30.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Preheating timeKnown for one1 minUnknown — not stated by the source
Lamination speedKnown for one1000 mm/minUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum document thicknessKnown for one0.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayNoNo
FormatDiffersA3A4
Product colourDiffersBlack, BlueGrey, White
Control typeKnown for oneButtonsUnknown — not stated by the source
TypeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHot laminator
Minimum pouch thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 µm
Maximum pouch thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 µm
Lamination systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePouch
Laminating timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 s
Number of rollersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Indication lightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGS, TUV, CE
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one1350 WUnknown — not stated by the source
CurrentKnown for one4.5 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers460 mm370 mm
DepthDiffers430 mm125 mm
HeightDiffers230 mm82 mm
WeightDiffers17 kg1.41 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one565 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one532 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one390 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one19.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons