Product comparison · 2 laminators

GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM vs Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 3identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM has 300 mm/min more lamination speed than the Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator (800 mm/min vs 500 mm/min). The Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator has 37 µm more minimum pouch thickness than the GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM (75 µm vs 38 µm). The GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM has 125 µm more maximum pouch thickness than the Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator (250 µm vs 125 µm). Type: Cold/hot laminator on the GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM, Hot laminator on the Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator. Product colour: Silver on the GBC HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM, Dark Grey, White on the Leitz iLAM Office A3 Laminator.

  • Type
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:Cold/hot laminator
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:Hot laminator
  • Lamination speed
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:800 mm/min
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:500 mm/min
  • Minimum pouch thickness
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:38 µm
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:75 µm
  • Maximum pouch thickness
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:250 µm
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:125 µm
  • Maximum document thickness
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:3.5 mm
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:0.5 mm
  • Warm-up time
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:8.5 min
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:1 min
  • Temperature (max)
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:150 °C
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:143 °C
  • Product colour
    • HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM:Silver
    • iLAM Office A3 Laminator:Dark Grey, White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HeatSeal ProSeries 3500LM, 72530184
34 specifications
Features8 differ
TypeDiffersCold/hot laminatorHot laminator
Maximum lamination widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source33 cm
Lamination speedDiffers800 mm/min500 mm/min
Maximum film thicknessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source125 µm
Minimum pouch thicknessDiffers38 µm75 µm
Maximum pouch thicknessDiffers250 µm125 µm
Maximum document thicknessDiffers3.5 mm0.5 mm
Built-in displayYesYes
Lamination systemPouchPouch
Laminating timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 s
Number of rollersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
Warm-up timeDiffers8.5 min1 min
FormatA3A3
Temperature (max)Differs150 °C143 °C
Product colourDiffersSilverDark Grey, White
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTouch
Indication lightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auto jam detectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneMetalUnknown — not stated by the source
Variable speedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1400 W
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220-240 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source470 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source144 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source102 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.74 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Laminator pouch includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of laminator pouchesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one406 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one691 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one271 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one17.1 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons