Product comparison · 2 laminators

Fellowes Amaris A3 vs HP OneLam 270 A4

16specifications compared
11differ
5identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The Fellowes Amaris A3 has 9 cm more maximum lamination width than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (32 cm vs 23 cm). The HP OneLam 270 A4 has 3 min more preheating time than the Fellowes Amaris A3 (4 min vs 1 min). The Fellowes Amaris A3 has 510 mm/min more lamination speed than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (780 mm/min vs 270 mm/min). Type: Cold laminator on the Fellowes Amaris A3, Hot laminator on the HP OneLam 270 A4. Format: A3 on the Fellowes Amaris A3, A4 on the HP OneLam 270 A4.

Type
- Amaris A3:Cold laminator
- OneLam 270 A4:Hot laminator
Maximum lamination width
- Amaris A3:32 cm
- OneLam 270 A4:23 cm
Preheating time
- Amaris A3:1 min
- OneLam 270 A4:4 min
Lamination speed
- Amaris A3:780 mm/min
- OneLam 270 A4:270 mm/min
Maximum document thickness
- Amaris A3:0.6 mm
- OneLam 270 A4:0.5 mm
Format
- Amaris A3:A3
- OneLam 270 A4:A4
Power consumption (typical)
- Amaris A3:1200 W
- OneLam 270 A4:230 W
Width
- Amaris A3:152.4 mm
- OneLam 270 A4:332 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Amaris A3, OneLam 270 A4
35 specifications	A Fellowes Amaris A3 View product	B HP OneLam 270 A4 View product
Features6 differ
TypeDiffers	Cold laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination widthDiffers	32 cm	23 cm
Preheating timeDiffers	1 min	4 min
Lamination speedDiffers	780 mm/min	270 mm/min
Minimum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 µm
Maximum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	125 µm
Maximum document thicknessDiffers	0.6 mm	0.5 mm
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Warm-up timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 min
FormatDiffers	A3	A4
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Temperature (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 °C
Indication lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to useKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Minimum pouch thicknessKnown for one	75 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum pouch thicknessKnown for one	175 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of rollersKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto standbyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto jam detectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	1200 W	230 W
CurrentKnown for one	5.5 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	152.4 mm	332 mm
DepthDiffers	474.7 mm	120 mm
HeightDiffers	101.6 mm	63 mm
WeightDiffers	1.91 kg	940 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	369 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	74 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	138 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.22 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons