Product comparison · 2 laminators

Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator vs GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator has 1 cm more maximum lamination width than the GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload (31.5 cm vs 30.5 cm). The Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator has 4 min more preheating time than the GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload (5 min vs 1 min). The GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload has 0.4 mm more maximum document thickness than the Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator (0.5 mm vs 0.1 mm). Product colour: White on the Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator, Black, Blue on the GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload.

Maximum lamination width
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:31.5 cm
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:30.5 cm
Preheating time
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:5 min
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:1 min
Maximum document thickness
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:0.1 mm
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:0.5 mm
Product colour
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:White
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:Black, Blue
Width
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:566 mm
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:460 mm
Depth
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:122 mm
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:430 mm
Height
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:86 mm
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:230 mm
Weight
- Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator:2.18 kg
- RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload:17 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 5725701, RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload
22 specifications	A Fellowes Cosmic 2 A3 Laminator Model 5725701 View product	B GBC RollSeal Ultima 35 Ezload View product
Features4 differ
Maximum lamination widthDiffers	31.5 cm	30.5 cm
Preheating timeDiffers	5 min	1 min
Lamination speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000 mm/min
Maximum document thicknessDiffers	0.1 mm	0.5 mm
FormatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A3
Product colourDiffers	White	Black, Blue
Number of rollersKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1350 W
CurrentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.5 A
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	566 mm	460 mm
DepthDiffers	122 mm	430 mm
HeightDiffers	86 mm	230 mm
WeightDiffers	2.18 kg	17 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	565 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	532 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	390 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	19.1 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84729080	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons