Product comparison · 2 laminators

Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator vs GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

The GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator has 1 cm more maximum lamination width than the Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator (33 cm vs 32 cm). The GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator has 0.42 mm more maximum document thickness than the Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator (0.5 mm vs 0.08 mm). The GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator has 350 mm more width than the Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator (500 mm vs 150 mm). Only the GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator has built-in display. Product colour: White on the Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator, Black, Stainless steel on the GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator.

Maximum lamination width
- Lunar A3 Laminator:32 cm
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:33 cm
Maximum document thickness
- Lunar A3 Laminator:0.08 mm
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:0.5 mm
Built-in display
- Lunar A3 Laminator:No
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:Yes
Product colour
- Lunar A3 Laminator:White
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:Black, Stainless steel
Width
- Lunar A3 Laminator:150 mm
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:500 mm
Depth
- Lunar A3 Laminator:486 mm
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:180 mm
Height
- Lunar A3 Laminator:82 mm
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:92 mm
Weight
- Lunar A3 Laminator:1.58 kg
- 250HS Office A3 Laminator:2.64 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 5716701, 4410071EU
35 specifications	A Fellowes Lunar A3 Laminator Model 5716701 View product	B GBC 250HS Office A3 Laminator Model 4410071EU View product
Features4 differ
Type	Hot laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination widthDiffers	32 cm	33 cm
Lamination speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 mm/min
Maximum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 µm
Minimum pouch thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 µm
Maximum pouch thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	125 µm
Maximum document thicknessDiffers	0.08 mm	0.5 mm
Built-in displayDiffers	No	Yes
Laminating timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36 s
Number of rollers	2	2
Warm-up timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 min
FormatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A3
Temperature (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	136 °C
Product colourDiffers	White	Black, Stainless steel
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto power off afterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 min
Reverse motor functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Preheating timeKnown for one	6 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1400 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	150 mm	500 mm
DepthDiffers	486 mm	180 mm
HeightDiffers	82 mm	92 mm
WeightDiffers	1.58 kg	2.64 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	240 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	565 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.46 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	84729080
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84729080	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons