Product comparison · 2 laminators

Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator vs HP OneLam 270 A4

17specifications compared
11differ
6identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The HP OneLam 270 A4 has 3 min more preheating time than the Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator (4 min vs 1 min). The Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator has 430 mm/min more lamination speed than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (700 mm/min vs 270 mm/min). The Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator has 0.5 mm more maximum document thickness than the HP OneLam 270 A4 (1 mm vs 0.5 mm). Product colour: Anthracite, White on the Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator, Grey, White on the HP OneLam 270 A4. AC input voltage: 220-240 V on the Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator, 220 - 240 V on the HP OneLam 270 A4.

Preheating time
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:1 min
- OneLam 270 A4:4 min
Lamination speed
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:700 mm/min
- OneLam 270 A4:270 mm/min
Maximum document thickness
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:1 mm
- OneLam 270 A4:0.5 mm
Temperature (max)
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:135 °C
- OneLam 270 A4:120 °C
Product colour
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:Anthracite, White
- OneLam 270 A4:Grey, White
Power consumption (typical)
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:300 W
- OneLam 270 A4:230 W
AC input voltage
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:220-240 V
- OneLam 270 A4:220 - 240 V
Width
- 74750000 laminator Hot laminator:414 mm
- OneLam 270 A4:332 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 74750000, OneLam 270 A4
38 specifications	A Esselte 74750000 laminator Hot laminator Model 74750000 View product	B HP OneLam 270 A4 View product
Features5 differ
Type	Hot laminator	Hot laminator
Maximum lamination width	23 cm	23 cm
Preheating timeDiffers	1 min	4 min
Lamination speedDiffers	700 mm/min	270 mm/min
Minimum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 µm
Maximum film thicknessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	125 µm
Maximum document thicknessDiffers	1 mm	0.5 mm
Built-in display	No	No
Warm-up timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 min
Format	A4	A4
Number of temperature settingsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Temperature (max)Differs	135 °C	120 °C
Product colourDiffers	Anthracite, White	Grey, White
Indication lightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to useKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ready indicator	Yes	Yes
Reverse motor function	Yes	Yes
Minimum pouch thicknessKnown for one	80 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum pouch thicknessKnown for one	250 µm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Laminating timeKnown for one	26 s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of rollersKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Variable speedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Buttons	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power off afterKnown for one	30 min	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	GS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	300 W	230 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50 - 60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	220-240 V	220 - 240 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	414 mm	332 mm
DepthDiffers	217 mm	120 mm
HeightDiffers	143 mm	63 mm
WeightDiffers	3.2 kg	940 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	369 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	74 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	138 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.22 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More laminator comparisons

All laminator comparisons