Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver vs ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 17identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver has 30 Hz more maximum refresh rate than the ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver (60 Hz vs 30 Hz). The ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver has 2 more RS-232 ports than the ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver (3 vs 1). The ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver has 5.2 cm more receiver width than the ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver (22.4 cm vs 17.2 cm). Type: Transmitter & receiver on the ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, Receiver on the ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver. Maximum digital resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the ATEN KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, 5120 x 2880 pixels on the ATEN KX9970R KVM extender Receiver.

  • Type
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:Transmitter & receiver
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:Receiver
  • Maximum digital resolution
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:3840 x 2160 pixels
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:5120 x 2880 pixels
  • Maximum refresh rate
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:30 Hz
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:60 Hz
  • USB port type
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:USB Type-A/USB Type-B
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:USB Type-A
  • RS-232 ports
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:3
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:1
  • Receiver width
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:17.2 cm
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:22.4 cm
  • Receiver depth
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:22.8 cm
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:22.6 cm
  • Receiver height
    • KE9950ATC-AX-U KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:5.48 cm
    • KX9970R KVM extender Receiver:5.3 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of KE9950ATC-AX-U, KX9970R
42 specifications
Features3 differ
TypeDiffersTransmitter & receiverReceiver
Maximum transfer distanceKnown for one10000 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum digital resolutionDiffers3840 x 2160 pixels5120 x 2880 pixels
Maximum refresh rateDiffers30 Hz60 Hz
Colour depthKnown for one24 bitUnknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD)Known for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitteridentical
Transmitter video port typeKnown for oneDisplayPortUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 ports quantity (transmitter)Known for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB port typeDiffersUSB Type-A/USB Type-BUSB Type-A
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 portsDiffers31
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Transmitter widthKnown for one16.3 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter depthKnown for one21.5 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter heightKnown for one4.18 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter weightKnown for one1.12 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver widthDiffers17.2 cm22.4 cm
Receiver depthDiffers22.8 cm22.6 cm
Receiver heightDiffers5.48 cm5.3 cm
Receiver weightDiffers1.24 kg1.38 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneAC, DVI, USBUnknown — not stated by the source
Mounting bracket(s) includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Quick installation guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons