Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution vs ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 16identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter has 5.2 cm more transmitter width than the ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution (21.5 cm vs 16.3 cm). The ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution has 5.2 cm more transmitter depth than the ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter (21.5 cm vs 16.3 cm). The ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter has 0.02 kg more transmitter weight than the ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution (1.15 kg vs 1.13 kg). Type: Transmitter & receiver on the ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution, Transmitter on the ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter. USB port type: USB Type-A/USB Type-B on the ATEN KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution, USB Type-A on the ATEN KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter.

  • Type
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:Transmitter & receiver
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:Transmitter
  • USB port type
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:USB Type-A/USB Type-B
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:USB Type-A
  • Transmitter width
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:16.3 cm
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:21.5 cm
  • Transmitter depth
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:21.5 cm
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:16.3 cm
  • Transmitter weight
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:1.13 kg
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:1.15 kg
  • Cables included
    • KE6910 Air Traffic Control Bundle Solution:AC, DVI, USB
    • KE6920T-AX-E KVM extender Transmitter:AC, KVM

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of KE6910ATC-AX-G, KE6920T-AX-E
43 specifications
Features1 differ
TypeDiffersTransmitter & receiverTransmitter
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Rack mountingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Supported resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2560 x 2048, 2560 x 1600, 2048 x 2048
Transmitteridentical
Transmitter local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiveridentical
RJ-45 ports quantity (receiver)Known for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Receiver local keyboard/mouse port typeKnown for oneUSBUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver local video port typeKnown for oneDVI-DUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB port typeDiffersUSB Type-A/USB Type-BUSB Type-A
USB data transfer ratesKnown for one480 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
RJ-45 ports quantityKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
RS-232 portsKnown for one3Unknown — not stated by the source
Installed SFP+ modules quantityKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Transmitter widthDiffers16.3 cm21.5 cm
Transmitter depthDiffers21.5 cm16.3 cm
Transmitter weightDiffers1.13 kg1.15 kg
Receiver widthKnown for one17.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver depthKnown for one22.8 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver heightKnown for one5.48 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver weightKnown for one1.26 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersAC, DVI, USBAC, KVM
Mounting bracket(s) includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source207 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source414 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source117 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.37 kg
Technical detailsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.63 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons