Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender vs ATEN CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver

27specifications compared
3differ
24identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver has 10 g more receiver weight than the ATEN CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender (640 g vs 630 g). The ATEN CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver has 10 g more weight than the ATEN CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender (640 g vs 630 g). USB port type: USB Type-B on the ATEN CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender, USB Type-A on the ATEN CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver.

USB port type
- CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender:USB Type-B
- CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver:USB Type-A
Receiver weight
- CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender:630 g
- CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver:640 g
Weight
- CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender:630 g
- CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver:640 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CE820L-ATA-G, CE920R-ATA-G
28 specifications	A ATEN CE820L-ATA-G KVM extender Model CE820L-ATA-G View product	B ATEN CE920R-ATA-G KVM extender Receiver Model CE920R-ATA-G View product
Featuresidentical
TypeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Receiver
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB port typeDiffers	USB Type-B	USB Type-A
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Receiver weightDiffers	630 g	640 g
Technical details1 differ
WeightDiffers	630 g	640 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons