Product comparison · 2 kvm extenders

ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver vs Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 12identical
  • 37known for one product only

Key differences

The ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver has 256 x 2160 pixels more maximum digital resolution than the Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver (4096 x 2160 pixels vs 3840 x 2160 pixels). The ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver has 2 more USB 2.0 ports quantity than the Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver (4 vs 2). The Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver has 19 V more AC adapter output voltage than the ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver (24 V vs 5 V). Type: Transmitter & receiver on the ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, Receiver on the Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver. Cable types supported: Cat5e, Cat6, Cat6a on the ATEN CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver, Cat6 on the Lindy 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver.

  • Type
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:Transmitter & receiver
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:Receiver
  • Cable types supported
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:Cat5e, Cat6, Cat6a
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:Cat6
  • Maximum digital resolution
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:4096 x 2160 pixels
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:3840 x 2160 pixels
  • Material
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:Metal
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:Metal, Plastic
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:4
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:2
  • AC adapter output voltage
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:5 V
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:24 V
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • CE820-ATA-E KVM extender Transmitter & receiver:0 - 80%
    • 150m Cat.6 HDMI 4K60, IR, RS-232 & Audio HDBaseT KVM Extender, Receiver:20 - 90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CE820-ATA-E, 38389
56 specifications
Features4 differ
TypeDiffersTransmitter & receiverReceiver
Cable types supportedDiffersCat5e, Cat6, Cat6aCat6
Maximum digital resolutionDiffers4096 x 2160 pixels3840 x 2160 pixels
Maximum refresh rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source60 Hz
Colour depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 bit
MaterialDiffersMetalMetal, Plastic
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, UKCA, FCC, RoHS, REACH & California Proposition 65
Rack mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitteridentical
Transmitter local video portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter local video port typeKnown for oneHDMIUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB port typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-A
HDMI versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers42
RS-232 portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
PC Audio inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
PC Audio outKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
AC adapter output voltageDiffers5 V24 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 A
Power consumption (transmitter) (max)Known for one2.87 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (receiver) (max)Known for one5.37 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source70 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source130 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source579 g
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs0 - 80%20 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
HDCP versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.2
Extended display identification data (EDID)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), REACH, RoHS, UKCA
Technical detailsidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source157 x 20 x 88 mm
Maximum resolutionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3840 x 2160 pixels
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source389 g
Logistics dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Transmitter widthKnown for one18.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter depthKnown for one12.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter heightKnown for one2.87 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Transmitter weightKnown for one630 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver widthKnown for one18.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver depthKnown for one12.2 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver heightKnown for one2.87 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Receiver weightKnown for one650 gUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More kvm extender comparisons

All kvm extender comparisons