All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 keyboards

HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug vs HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo

Add a product
  • 27specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 22identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

The HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo has 2.5 mm more package width than the HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug (449 mm vs 446.5 mm). The HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo has 2.5 mm more package depth than the HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug (199 mm vs 196.5 mm). The HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo has 3 mm more package height than the HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug (48 mm vs 45 mm). HP segment: Business on the HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug, Home on the HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo. Package weight: 713 g on the HP 175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plug, 1.08 kg on the HP 170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo.

  • HP segment
    • Business
    • Home
  • Package width
    • 446.5 mm
    • 449 mm
  • Package depth
    • 196.5 mm
    • 199 mm
  • Package height
    • 45 mm
    • 48 mm
  • Package weight
    • 713 g
    • 1.08 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
30 specifications
A

HP

175C WRD MSE KB Combo EMEA-INTL English Loc-Euro plugView product
B

HP

170C Wired Mouse and Keyboard Combo

Model D54DKAA

View product
Keyboardidentical
Silent keysYesYes
Country of originChinaChina
Design1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
HP segmentDiffersBusinessHome
Mouseidentical
Mouse includedYesYes
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedWindows 10, Windows 11Windows 10, Windows 11
Mac operating systems supportedMacOSMacOS
Minimum system requirementsUSB Type-A portUSB Type-A port
Other operating systems supportedChromeOSChromeOS
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesCB, EAC, BIS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMICB, EAC, BIS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
Sustainability certificatesForest Stewardship Council (FSC)Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
Sustainable technologies and materialsAt least 75% post-consumer recycled plastic; FSC Certified PackagingAt least 75% post-consumer recycled plastic; FSC Certified Packaging
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one199896860895
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Keyboard dimensions (WxDxH)428.83 x 117.37 x 19.1 mm428.83 x 117.37 x 19.1 mm
Mouse dimensions (WxDxH)123 x 65 x 40 mm123 x 65 x 40 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Warranty cardYesYes
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers446.5 mm449 mm
Package depthDiffers196.5 mm199 mm
Package heightDiffers45 mm48 mm
Package weightDiffers713 g1.08 kg
Technical detailsidentical
General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) URLKnown for onehttps://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_6126692-6126777-16?openCLC=true
Other featuresidentical
CompatibilityKnown for oneUSB-A
Compatible operating systemsWindows 11; Windows 10; macOS; ChromeOSWindows 11; Windows 10; macOS; ChromeOS
UNSPSC-code4321173343211733
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross weight175 kg175 kg
Master (outer) cases per pallet16 pc(s)16 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layer4 pc(s)4 pc(s)
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H)1020 x 1146 x 938 mm1020 x 1146 x 938 mm
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)1020.1 x 1146 x 938 mm (40.2 x 45.1 x 36.9")1020.1 x 1146 x 938 mm (40.2 x 45.1 x 36.9")
Pallet weight (imperial)175 kg (385.9 lbs)175 kg (385.9 lbs)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More keyboard comparisons

All keyboard comparisons