Product comparison · 2 keyboards

Contour Design CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black vs Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 4identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

The Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White has 124 g more keyboard weight than the Contour Design CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black (782 g vs 658 g). The Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White has 44 mm more package width than the Contour Design CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black (191 mm vs 147 mm). The Contour Design CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black has 30 mm more package depth than the Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White (456 mm vs 426 mm). Only the Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White has backlight. Recommended usage: Home/Office on the Contour Design CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black, Gaming on the Mars Gaming MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White.

  • Recommended usage
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Home/Office
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Gaming
  • Connectivity technology
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Wireless
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Wired
  • Device interface
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:RF Wireless
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:USB
  • Keyboard key switch
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Scissor key switch
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Mechanical
  • Keyboard language
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Nordic
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Spanish, French, Portuguese
  • Keyboard form factor
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Full-size (100%)
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Tenkeyless (80 - 87%)
  • Backlight
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:No
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:Yes
  • Product colour
    • CDTP1050BALPN1050 keyboard Home/Office RF Wireless QWERTY Nordic Black:Black
    • MKMASTERW keyboard USB Spanish, French, Portuguese White:White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CDTP1050BALPN1050, MKMASTERW
42 specifications
Keyboard6 differ
Recommended usageDiffersHome/OfficeGaming
Connectivity technologyDiffersWirelessWired
Device interfaceDiffersRF WirelessUSB
Keyboard key switchDiffersScissor key switchMechanical
Keyboard layoutKnown for oneQWERTYUnknown — not stated by the source
Keyboard languageDiffersNordicSpanish, French, Portuguese
Pointing deviceKnown for oneTouchpadUnknown — not stated by the source
Keyboard form factorDiffersFull-size (100%)Tenkeyless (80 - 87%)
Numeric keypadYesYes
Keyboard number of keysKnown for one111Unknown — not stated by the source
Frequency bandKnown for one2.4 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of programmable (macro) keysKnown for one18Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
BacklightDiffersNoYes
Ergonomic designKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Power1 differ
Power source typeDiffersBatteryUSB
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 W
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 W
Batteryidentical
Battery capacityKnown for one800 mAhUnknown — not stated by the source
Mouseidentical
Mouse includedNoNo
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Keyboard dimensions (WxDxH)Differs117 x 434 x 13 mm385 x 143 x 43 mm
Keyboard weightDiffers658 g782 g
Packaging contentidentical
Number of products included1 pc(s)1 pc(s)
AC adapter includedNoNo
Packaging contentKnown for oneContour Touch,Keyboard,USB-C charging cable,2 SnapLinksUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers147 mm191 mm
Package depthDiffers456 mm426 mm
Package heightDiffers68 mm60 mm
Package weightDiffers1.64 kg1.05 kg
Other featuresidentical
ErgonomicsKnown for oneergonomically shaped keycaps, designed in accordance with ISO 9241 ergonomic guidance, built-in wrist rest, full-size PU foam wrist rest for palm and wrist support, centered touchpad to eliminate side-reach, reduced wrist extension, ambidextrous control (right, left, or both hands)Unknown — not stated by the source
ManufacturerKnown for oneContour DesignUnknown — not stated by the source
Carbon footprintidentical
Cradle-to-Gate emissions (kg of CO2e)Known for one7.61Unknown — not stated by the source
Cradle-to-grave emissions (kg of CO2e)Known for one8.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Recycling dataidentical
Packaging recycled contentKnown for one70%Unknown — not stated by the source
Product recycled contentKnown for one70%Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one5 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case widthKnown for one175 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for one483 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case heightKnown for one370 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for one9.22 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More keyboard comparisons

All keyboard comparisons