Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Philips Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer vs Philips Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer

16specifications compared
6differ
10identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

Pulp container capacity
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.5 L
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:0.75 L
Juice container capacity
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.5 L
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1 L
Cord length
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.5 m
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.05 m
Juice jug capacity
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.5 ml
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1 ml
Power
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:200 W
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:150 W
AC input voltage
- Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:220 V
- Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:220-240 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HR1882/31R1, HR1888/70R1
44 specifications	A Philips Avance Collection HR1882/31R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer Model HR1882/31R1 View product	B Philips Viva Collection HR1888/70R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer Model HR1888/70R1 View product
Features4 differ
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black, White
Pulp container capacityDiffers	1.5 L	0.75 L
Juice container capacityDiffers	1.5 L	1 L
Feeding tube diameterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7 cm
Extra wide feedingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord lengthDiffers	1.5 m	1.05 m
Easy to assembleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cord storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Juice jug capacityDiffers	1.5 ml	1 ml
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
QuickCleanKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auger typeKnown for one	Vertical auger	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Rotary	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for fruit/vegetable typeKnown for one	Soft	Unknown — not stated by the source
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Jug materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Power2 differ
PowerDiffers	200 W	150 W
AC input voltageDiffers	220 V	220-240 V
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	136.5 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	361.7 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	360.9 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.4 kg
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Doesn't containKnown for one	Bisphenol A (BPA)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical detailsidentical
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	185 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	440 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	395 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.8 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons