Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer vs Tefal Juiceo ZC150

11specifications compared
6differ
5identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer has 0.4 L more pulp container capacity than the Tefal Juiceo ZC150 (1.2 L vs 0.8 L). The Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer has 1.2 L more juice container capacity than the Tefal Juiceo ZC150 (2 L vs 0.8 L). The Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer has 3 cm more feeding tube diameter than the Tefal Juiceo ZC150 (7.5 cm vs 4.5 cm). Product type: Centrifugal juicer on the Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer, Slow juicer on the Tefal Juiceo ZC150. Product colour: Aluminium on the Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer, Black, Red on the Tefal Juiceo ZC150.

Product type
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:Centrifugal juicer
- Juiceo ZC150:Slow juicer
Product colour
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:Aluminium
- Juiceo ZC150:Black, Red
Pulp container capacity
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:1.2 L
- Juiceo ZC150:0.8 L
Juice container capacity
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:2 L
- Juiceo ZC150:0.8 L
Feeding tube diameter
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:7.5 cm
- Juiceo ZC150:4.5 cm
Power
- Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer:800 W
- Juiceo ZC150:150 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HR1863/20R1, Juiceo ZC150
34 specifications	A Philips Viva Collection HR1863/20R1 juice maker Centrifugal juicer Model HR1863/20R1 View product	B Tefal Juiceo ZC150 View product
Features5 differ
Product typeDiffers	Centrifugal juicer	Slow juicer
Product colourDiffers	Aluminium	Black, Red
Pulp container capacityDiffers	1.2 L	0.8 L
Juice container capacityDiffers	2 L	0.8 L
Feeding tube diameterDiffers	7.5 cm	4.5 cm
Extra wide feedingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	1 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auger typeKnown for one	Vertical auger	Unknown — not stated by the source
Locking systemKnown for one	Safety clamp	Unknown — not stated by the source
Safety switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to assembleKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Buttons	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher proof accessoriesKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Food pusherKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Juice jug capacityKnown for one	0.8 ml	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Safety clamp(s)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for fruit/vegetable typeKnown for one	Soft/Hard	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 RPM
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Jug materialKnown for one	Styrene-Acrylonitrile Resin (SAN)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pulp container & pusher materialKnown for one	Polystyrene (PS)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	800 W	150 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	220-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons