Product comparison · 2 juice makers

NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker vs Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 3identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker has 1 more speeds than the Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished (2 vs 1). The NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker has 0.5 L more pulp container capacity than the Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished (1.5 L vs 1 L). The NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker has 0.3 L more juice container capacity than the Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished (0.8 L vs 0.5 L). Product colour: Black, Grey on the NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker, Grey on the Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished. Housing material: Plastic, Stainless steel on the NutriBullet NBJ100G juice maker, Aluminium on the Philips Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished.

  • Product colour
    • NBJ100G juice maker:Black, Grey
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:Grey
  • Number of speeds
    • NBJ100G juice maker:2
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:1
  • Pulp container capacity
    • NBJ100G juice maker:1.5 L
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:1 L
  • Juice container capacity
    • NBJ100G juice maker:0.8 L
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:0.5 L
  • Housing material
    • NBJ100G juice maker:Plastic, Stainless steel
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:Aluminium
  • Power
    • NBJ100G juice maker:800 W
    • Viva Collection HR1836 Juicer - Refurbished:500 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of NBJ100G, HR1836/01R1
33 specifications
A

NutriBullet

NBJ100G juice maker

Model NBJ100G

View product
Features4 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, GreyGrey
Colour nameKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAluminium Grey
Number of speedsDiffers21
Pulp container capacityDiffers1.5 L1 L
Juice container capacityDiffers0.8 L0.5 L
Feeding tube diameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.5 cm
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 m
Locking systemKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSafety clamp
Safety switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cord storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Juice jug capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 ml
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Safety clamp(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Control typeKnown for oneRotaryUnknown — not stated by the source
Pulse functionKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Material1 differ
Housing materialDiffersPlastic, Stainless steelAluminium
Jug materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePolypropylene (PP)
Pulp container & pusher materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStyrene-Acrylonitrile Resin (SAN), Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers800 W500 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220/240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Packaging contentidentical
Packaging contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNone
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one240 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one223 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one407 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one5.01 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneBisphenol A (BPA)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons