Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B vs Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam

Add a product
  • 21specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 8identical
  • 49known for one product only

Key differences

The Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam has 20 RPM more rotational speed than the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B (80 RPM vs 60 RPM). The Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam has 100 W more power than the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B (300 W vs 200 W). The Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam has 5 mm more width than the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B (190 mm vs 185 mm). Product type: Electric tomato juicer on the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B, Slow juicer on the Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam. Product colour: Silver, Grey on the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B, Charcoal on the Unold 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam.

  • Product type
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:Electric tomato juicer
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:Slow juicer
  • Product colour
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:Silver, Grey
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:Charcoal
  • Rotational speed
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:60 RPM
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:80 RPM
  • Power
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:200 W
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:300 W
  • Width
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:185 mm
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:190 mm
  • Depth
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:340 mm
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:178 mm
  • Height
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:420 mm
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:398 mm
  • Weight
    • Infiny Juice ZU255B:4.4 kg
    • 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam:2.6 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of Infiny Juice ZU255B, 78275 SLOW JUICER Sam
70 specifications
Features3 differ
Product typeDiffersElectric tomato juicerSlow juicer
Product colourDiffersSilver, GreyCharcoal
Rotational speedDiffers60 RPM80 RPM
Detachable pulp containerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Detachable juice containerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Feeding tube diameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source11 cm
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.9 m
Cable colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Juice jug capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source800 ml
Lid with filling holeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Overheat protectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
ReverseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Auger typeKnown for oneVertical augerUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of filtersKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneTouchUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Direct flowKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
On/off switchKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Material1 differ
MaterialDiffersPlasticAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Filter materialKnown for oneStainless steelUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers200 W300 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50/60 Hz
Power plugKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType C (CEE 7/16)
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers185 mm190 mm
DepthDiffers340 mm178 mm
HeightDiffers420 mm398 mm
WeightDiffers4.4 kg2.6 kg
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Recipe bookKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Manual languagesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceGerman, Dutch, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Polish
JugKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) complianceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBisphenol A (BPA)
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Other packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 g
Paper packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source430 g
Plastic packaging weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source198 g
Package widthDiffers327 mm335 mm
Package depthDiffers375 mm190 mm
Package heightDiffers325 mm370 mm
Package weightDiffers7 kg4.2 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE
Logistics dataidentical
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 pc(s)
Customs product code (TARIC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85094000
Products per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Pallet gross widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source120 cm
Pallet gross heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source185 cm
Pallet gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source19 kg
Master (outer) cases per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 pc(s)
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8 pc(s)
Master (outer) case widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source353 mm
Master (outer) case lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source202 mm
Master (outer) case heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source396 mm
Master (outer) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.2 kg
Shipping (inner) case gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.7 kg
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons