Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B vs Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer

13specifications compared
11differ
2identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B has 160 W more power than the Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer (200 W vs 40 W). The Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer has 35 mm more width than the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B (220 mm vs 185 mm). The Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B has 175 mm more depth than the Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer (340 mm vs 165 mm). Product type: Electric tomato juicer on the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B, Hand juicer on the Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer. Product colour: Silver, Grey on the Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B, Orange, Translucent on the Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer.

Product type
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:Electric tomato juicer
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:Hand juicer
Product colour
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:Silver, Grey
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:Orange, Translucent
Power
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:200 W
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:40 W
Width
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:185 mm
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:220 mm
Depth
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:340 mm
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:165 mm
Height
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:420 mm
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:155 mm
Weight
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:4.4 kg
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:720 g
Package width
- Infiny Juice ZU255B:327 mm
- EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer:178 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Infiny Juice ZU255B, EXP-SS-5223
35 specifications	A Moulinex Infiny Juice ZU255B View product	B Sogo EXP-SS-5223 juice maker Hand juicer Model EXP-SS-5223 View product
Features2 differ
Product typeDiffers	Electric tomato juicer	Hand juicer
Product colourDiffers	Silver, Grey	Orange, Translucent
Number of speedsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Rotational speedKnown for one	60 RPM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pulp containerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Juice containerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Juice container capacityKnown for one	0.8 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auger typeKnown for one	Vertical auger	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of filtersKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Anti-drip functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for one	Touch	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Direct flowKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to clean	Yes	Yes
Non-slip feetKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
On/off switch	Yes	Yes
Easy to assembleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Jug capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 L
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Filter materialKnown for one	Stainless steel	Unknown — not stated by the source
MaterialKnown for one	Plastic	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	200 W	40 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	185 mm	220 mm
DepthDiffers	340 mm	165 mm
HeightDiffers	420 mm	155 mm
WeightDiffers	4.4 kg	720 g
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Bisphenol A (BPA)
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning brushKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
JugKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	327 mm	178 mm
Package depthDiffers	375 mm	178 mm
Package heightDiffers	325 mm	165 mm
Package weightDiffers	7 kg	820 g

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons