Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Hotpoint SJ 4010 FR0 vs Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 1identical
  • 32known for one product only

Key differences

The Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10 has 32.2 mm more width than the Hotpoint SJ 4010 FR0 (185.2 mm vs 153 mm). The Hotpoint SJ 4010 FR0 has 11.8 mm more depth than the Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10 (268 mm vs 256.2 mm). The Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10 has 76.9 mm more height than the Hotpoint SJ 4010 FR0 (421.9 mm vs 345 mm). Only the Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10 has pulp container. Product type: Slow juicer on the Hotpoint SJ 4010 FR0, Electric tomato juicer on the Moulinex Juice & Clean ZU420A10.

  • Product type
    • SJ 4010 FR0:Slow juicer
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:Electric tomato juicer
  • Product colour
    • SJ 4010 FR0:Black, Red
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:Black, Grey
  • Pulp container
    • SJ 4010 FR0:No
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:Yes
  • Width
    • SJ 4010 FR0:153 mm
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:185.2 mm
  • Depth
    • SJ 4010 FR0:268 mm
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:256.2 mm
  • Height
    • SJ 4010 FR0:345 mm
    • Juice & Clean ZU420A10:421.9 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SJ 4010 FR0, Juice & Clean ZU420A10
39 specifications
Features3 differ
Product typeDiffersSlow juicerElectric tomato juicer
Product colourDiffersBlack, RedBlack, Grey
Control panel colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Variable speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Number of speedsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Rotational speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source80 RPM
Pulp containerDiffersNoYes
Number of filtersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 pc(s)
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Cord storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Direct flowKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Foam separatorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
On/off switchYesYes
Pulp container capacityKnown for one0.5 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice containerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice container capacityKnown for one0.5 LUnknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one1.4 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice extractorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice jug capacityKnown for one500 mlUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-slip feetKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Filter materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStainless steel
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic, Stainless steel
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers153 mm185.2 mm
DepthDiffers268 mm256.2 mm
HeightDiffers345 mm421.9 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 g
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning brushKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source268 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source387 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source320 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.1 kg
Poweridentical
PowerKnown for one400 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons