Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist vs Philips Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 6identical
  • 31known for one product only

Key differences

The Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist has 0.2 L more juice container capacity than the Philips Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer (1.2 L vs 1 L). Product colour: Black, Turquoise on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, White on the Philips Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer. AC input voltage: 220 - 240 V on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, 220-240 V on the Philips Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer. AC input frequency: 50/60 Hz on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, 50-60 Hz on the Philips Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer.

  • Product colour
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:Black, Turquoise
    • Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer:White
  • Juice container capacity
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:1.2 L
    • Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer:1 L
  • AC input voltage
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:220 - 240 V
    • Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer:220-240 V
  • AC input frequency
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:50/60 Hz
    • Avance Collection HR1894/80R1 juice maker Slow juicer:50-60 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of BKK 1482 Vitaminist, HR1894/80R1
41 specifications
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, TurquoiseWhite
Rotational speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source300 RPM
Pulp container capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 L
Juice container capacityDiffers1.2 L1 L
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 m
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Juice jug capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 ml
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Pulp container materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
QuickCleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Detachable pulp containerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Detachable juice containerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Control typeKnown for oneButtonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher proof accessoriesKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Food pusherKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ReverseKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for fruit/vegetable typeKnown for oneHardUnknown — not stated by the source
Materialidentical
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Bowl materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
AC input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V220-240 V
AC input frequencyDiffers50/60 Hz50-60 Hz
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Packaging contentidentical
Recipe bookKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Packaging contentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNone
Cleaning brushKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source90%
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one252 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one173 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one428 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one4.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons