Product comparison · 2 juice makers

Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist vs Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 4identical
  • 28known for one product only

Key differences

The Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist has 0.7 L more juice container capacity than the Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer (1.2 L vs 0.5 L). The Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer has 300 W more power than the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist (500 W vs 200 W). Product type: Slow juicer on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, Steam juicer on the Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer. Product colour: Black, Turquoise on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, Black on the Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer. AC input voltage: 220 - 240 V on the Beko BKK 1482 Vitaminist, 110 V on the Philips HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer.

  • Product type
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:Slow juicer
    • HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer:Steam juicer
  • Product colour
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:Black, Turquoise
    • HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer:Black
  • Juice container capacity
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:1.2 L
    • HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer:0.5 L
  • Power
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:200 W
    • HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer:500 W
  • AC input voltage
    • BKK 1482 Vitaminist:220 - 240 V
    • HR1832/06 juice maker Steam juicer:110 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of BKK 1482 Vitaminist, HR1832/06
37 specifications
Features3 differ
Product typeDiffersSlow juicerSteam juicer
Product colourDiffersBlack, TurquoiseBlack
Pulp containerYesYes
Detachable pulp containerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Juice containerYesYes
Juice container capacityDiffers1.2 L0.5 L
Detachable juice containerKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Locking systemSafety clampSafety clamp
Control typeKnown for oneButtonsUnknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher proof accessoriesKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Food pusherKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
ReverseKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Suitable for fruit/vegetable typeKnown for oneHardUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of speedsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Pulp container capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 L
Feeding tube diameterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.5 cm
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 m
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cord storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Jug capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 L
Juice jug capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 ml
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Pulp container materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceABS / SAN
Materialidentical
Bowl materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAcrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
Power2 differ
PowerDiffers200 W500 W
AC input voltageDiffers220 - 240 V110 V
AC input frequency50/60 Hz50/60 Hz
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one252 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one173 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one428 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one4.8 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cleaning brushKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More juice maker comparisons

All juice maker comparisons