Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology vs Philips GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 20identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

  • Cord length
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:3 m
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:2.5 m
  • Steam boost performance
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:230 g/min
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:250 g/min
  • Variable steam
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:No
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:Yes
  • Product colour
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:Black, Blue, Red
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:Black, Blue
  • Continuous steam performance
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:55 g/min
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:65 g/min
  • Water tank capacity
    • Azur Advanced GC4933/80 Steam Iron with OptimalTEMP technology:0.33 L
    • GC5032/20 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:0.35 L

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GC4933/80, GC5032/20
30 specifications
Features6 differ
Cord lengthDiffers3 m2.5 m
Steam boost performanceDiffers230 g/min250 g/min
Variable steamDiffersNoYes
Product colourDiffersBlack, Blue, RedBlack, Blue
Continuous steam performanceDiffers55 g/min65 g/min
Water tank capacityDiffers0.33 L0.35 L
Calc-clean functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Energy saving modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Turbo steamKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons