Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80 vs Rowenta Everlast Anticalc DW7110

14specifications compared
7differ
7identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

Type
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:Steam iron
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:Dry & Steam iron
Steam boost performance
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:220 g/min
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:200 g/min
Product colour
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:Beige, Black
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:Black, Blue
Continuous steam performance
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:50 g/min
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:40 g/min
Water tank capacity
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:0.35 L
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:0.375 L
Iron power
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:3000 W
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:2700 W
Weight
- PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80:1.75 kg
- Everlast Anticalc DW7110:2.1 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GC4929/80, Everlast Anticalc DW7110
31 specifications	A Philips PerfectCare Azur Steam iron GC4929/80 Model GC4929/80 View product	B Rowenta Everlast Anticalc DW7110 View product
Features5 differ
TypeDiffers	Steam iron	Dry & Steam iron
Steam boost performanceDiffers	220 g/min	200 g/min
Variable steamKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Product colourDiffers	Beige, Black	Black, Blue
Continuous steam performanceDiffers	50 g/min	40 g/min
Water tank capacityDiffers	0.35 L	0.375 L
Adjustable thermostatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Soleplate typeKnown for one	T-ionicGlide soleplate	Unknown — not stated by the source
Automatic anti-calcKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fast heatKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of settingsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Programmable safety shut-offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soft gripKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Spray functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Non-twisting cordKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Designed for travelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Cord storageKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Indicationidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	3000 W	2700 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	145 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	180 mm
WeightDiffers	1.75 kg	2.1 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons