Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips Azur Pro GC4883/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate vs Philips Azur Pro GC4889/30 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate

Add a product
  • 29specifications compared
  • 4differ
  • 25identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

  • Steam boost performance
    • Azur Pro GC4883/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:220 g/min
    • Azur Pro GC4889/30 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:240 g/min
  • Product colour
    • Azur Pro GC4883/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:Black, Brown
    • Azur Pro GC4889/30 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:Black, Violet
  • Continuous steam performance
    • Azur Pro GC4883/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:50 g/min
    • Azur Pro GC4889/30 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:55 g/min
  • Iron power
    • Azur Pro GC4883/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2800 W
    • Azur Pro GC4889/30 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:3000 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GC4883/80, GC4889/30
31 specifications
Features3 differ
Steam boost performanceDiffers220 g/min240 g/min
Product colourDiffersBlack, BrownBlack, Violet
Continuous steam performanceDiffers50 g/min55 g/min
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Suitable for tap waterKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers2800 W3000 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons