Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips Azur Pro GC4882/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate vs Philips Azur Pro GC4886/87 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate

Add a product
  • 35specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 32identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

  • Steam boost performance
    • Azur Pro GC4882/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:220 g/min
    • Azur Pro GC4886/87 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:230 g/min
  • Continuous steam performance
    • Azur Pro GC4882/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:50 g/min
    • Azur Pro GC4886/87 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:45 g/min
  • Iron power
    • Azur Pro GC4882/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2800 W
    • Azur Pro GC4886/87 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2400 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of GC4882/80, GC4886/87
37 specifications
Features2 differ
Steam boost performanceDiffers220 g/min230 g/min
Continuous steam performanceDiffers50 g/min45 g/min
Ergonomicsidentical
Non-twisting cordKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers2800 W2400 W
Packaging contentidentical
Accessories includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCordGuide

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons