Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips Azur Pro GC4881/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate vs Philips Azur Pro Steam iron GC4887/30

27specifications compared
3differ
24identical
7known for one product only

Key differences

Steam boost performance
- Azur Pro GC4881/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:210 g/min
- Azur Pro Steam iron GC4887/30:230 g/min
Product colour
- Azur Pro GC4881/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:Black, Brown
- Azur Pro Steam iron GC4887/30:Black, Purple
Iron power
- Azur Pro GC4881/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2800 W
- Azur Pro Steam iron GC4887/30:3000 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GC4881/80, GC4887/30
34 specifications	A Philips Azur Pro GC4881/80 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate Model GC4881/80 View product	B Philips Azur Pro Steam iron GC4887/30 Model GC4887/30 View product
Features2 differ
Steam boost performanceDiffers	210 g/min	230 g/min
Product colourDiffers	Black, Brown	Black, Purple
Calc-clean functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Energy saving modeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Iron weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.5 kg
Soleplate typeKnown for one	T-ionicGlide soleplate	Unknown — not stated by the source
Auto power offKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Non-twisting cordKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Designed for travelKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	2800 W	3000 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons