Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27 vs Philips PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27

Key differences

Cord length
- AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27:2.4 m
- PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27:2.5 m
Continuous steam performance
- AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27:30 g/min
- PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27:50 g/min
Water tank capacity
- AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27:0.25 L
- PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27:0.32 L
Iron power
- AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27:2000 W
- PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27:2600 W

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of GC4820/27, GC5050/27
15 specifications	A Philips AZUR 2-in-1 Cordless steam iron GC4820/27 Model GC4820/27 View product	B Philips PerfectCare Xpress Pressurised steam iron GC5050/27 Model GC5050/27 View product
Features3 differ
Cord lengthDiffers	2.4 m	2.5 m
Steam boost performanceKnown for one	180 g/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Continuous steam performanceDiffers	30 g/min	50 g/min
Automatic anti-calcKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water tank capacityDiffers	0.25 L	0.32 L
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Swivel angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	360°
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	2000 W	2600 W
AC input voltageKnown for one	220-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord storageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.