Product comparison · 2 irons

Philips EasySpeed GC1022/71 iron Steam iron vs Philips PerfectCare Azur GC4910/11 iron Steam iron SteamGlide soleplate

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 4identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

  • Continuous steam performance
    • EasySpeed GC1022/71 iron Steam iron:25 g/min
    • PerfectCare Azur GC4910/11 iron Steam iron SteamGlide soleplate:45 g/min
  • Water tank capacity
    • EasySpeed GC1022/71 iron Steam iron:0.2 L
    • PerfectCare Azur GC4910/11 iron Steam iron SteamGlide soleplate:0.35 L
  • Iron power
    • EasySpeed GC1022/71 iron Steam iron:2000 W
    • PerfectCare Azur GC4910/11 iron Steam iron SteamGlide soleplate:2400 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of GC1022/71, GC4910/11
16 specifications
Features2 differ
TypeSteam ironSteam iron
Soleplate typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSteamGlide soleplate
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.5 m
Steam boost performanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source180 g/min
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlue, White
Steam boost functionYesYes
Continuous steam performanceDiffers25 g/min45 g/min
Water tank capacityDiffers0.2 L0.35 L
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CordlessNoNo
Programmable safety shut-offKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Spray functionYesYes
Self-cleaningKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Cord storageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers2000 W2400 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.75 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons