Product comparison · 2 irons

Moulinex IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate vs Philips Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron

8specifications compared
7differ
1identical
15known for one product only

Key differences

Cord length
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:1.8 m
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:2.5 m
Steam boost performance
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:20 g/min
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:220 g/min
Product colour
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:Blue, White
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:Black, Red
Continuous steam performance
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:80 g/min
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:45 g/min
Water tank capacity
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:0.2 L
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:0.35 L
Iron power
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:1800 W
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:2400 W
Weight
- IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate:1.18 kg
- Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron:1.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IM1233E0, GC4884/87
23 specifications	A Moulinex IM1233E0 iron Steam iron Stainless Steel soleplate Model IM1233E0 View product	B Philips Azur Pro GC4884/87 iron Model GC4884/87 View product
Features5 differ
TypeKnown for one	Steam iron	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soleplate typeKnown for one	Stainless Steel soleplate	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthDiffers	1.8 m	2.5 m
Steam boost performanceDiffers	20 g/min	220 g/min
Variable steamKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Blue, White	Black, Red
Steam boost functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Continuous steam performanceDiffers	80 g/min	45 g/min
Water tank capacityDiffers	0.2 L	0.35 L
Anti-scale systemKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
CordlessKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Spray functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical steam function	Yes	Yes
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Suitable for tap waterKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Non-twisting cordKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	1800 W	2400 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	1800 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one	260 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one	117 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	127 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	1.18 kg	1.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons