Product comparison · 2 irons

Imetec TITANOX K113 vs Philips Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate

Add a product
  • 14specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 7identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

  • Type
    • TITANOX K113:Dry & Steam iron
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:Steam iron
  • Soleplate type
    • TITANOX K113:Stainless Steel soleplate
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:SteamGlide Plus soleplate
  • Cord length
    • TITANOX K113:1.9 m
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:2 m
  • Steam boost performance
    • TITANOX K113:90 g/min
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:150 g/min
  • Automatic anti-calc
    • TITANOX K113:Yes
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:No
  • Water tank capacity
    • TITANOX K113:0.25 L
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:0.3 L
  • Iron power
    • TITANOX K113:2100 W
    • Azur Performer GC3810/27 iron Steam iron SteamGlide Plus soleplate:2400 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TITANOX K113, GC3810/27
23 specifications
Features6 differ
TypeDiffersDry & Steam ironSteam iron
Soleplate typeDiffersStainless Steel soleplateSteamGlide Plus soleplate
Cord lengthDiffers1.9 m2 m
Steam boost performanceDiffers90 g/min150 g/min
Variable steamYesYes
Self-cleaningKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourBlue, WhiteBlue, White
Steam boost functionYesYes
Automatic anti-calcDiffersYesNo
Water tank capacityDiffers0.25 L0.3 L
CordlessNoNo
Maximum continuous flowKnown for one25 g/minUnknown — not stated by the source
Minimum continuous flowKnown for one0 g/minUnknown — not stated by the source
Spray functionYesYes
Vertical steam functionYesYes
Continuous steam performanceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 g/min
Anti-drip functionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Designed for travelNoNo
Ergonomic designKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-twisting cordKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers2100 W2400 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one220-240 VUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons