Product comparison · 2 irons

Imetec Titanox K106 vs Philips AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron

Key differences

Soleplate type
- Titanox K106:Stainless Steel soleplate
- AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron:Anodilium soleplate
Cord length
- Titanox K106:2 m
- AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron:2.4 m
Steam boost performance
- Titanox K106:15 g/min
- AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron:160 g/min
Product colour
- Titanox K106:Green, White
- AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron:Violet, White
Iron power
- Titanox K106:1900 W
- AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron:2000 W

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Titanox K106, GC4810/02
15 specifications	A Imetec Titanox K106 View product	B Philips AZUR 2-in-1 GC4810/02 Cordless steam iron Model GC4810/02 View product
Features4 differ
TypeKnown for one	Dry & Steam iron	Unknown — not stated by the source
Soleplate typeDiffers	Stainless Steel soleplate	Anodilium soleplate
Cord lengthDiffers	2 m	2.4 m
Steam boost performanceDiffers	15 g/min	160 g/min
Variable steamKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Green, White	Violet, White
Continuous steam performanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 g/min
Anti-drip functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Spray functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	1900 W	2000 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	230 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Pointed tipKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.