Product comparison · 2 irons

Imetec Intellivapor K3 vs Philips Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate

16specifications compared
6differ
10identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

Type
- Intellivapor K3:Dry & Steam iron
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:Steam iron
Soleplate type
- Intellivapor K3:Stainless Steel soleplate
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:T-ionicGlide soleplate
Cord length
- Intellivapor K3:1.9 m
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2 m
Steam boost performance
- Intellivapor K3:160 g/min
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:200 g/min
Continuous steam performance
- Intellivapor K3:36 g/min
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:50 g/min
Iron power
- Intellivapor K3:2300 W
- Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate:2600 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Intellivapor K3, GC4525/10
35 specifications	A Imetec Intellivapor K3 View product	B Philips Azur Performer Plus GC4525/10 iron Steam iron T-ionicGlide soleplate Model GC4525/10 View product
Features5 differ
TypeDiffers	Dry & Steam iron	Steam iron
Soleplate typeDiffers	Stainless Steel soleplate	T-ionicGlide soleplate
Cord lengthDiffers	1.9 m	2 m
Steam boost performanceDiffers	160 g/min	200 g/min
Auto power offKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Continuous steam performanceDiffers	36 g/min	50 g/min
Adjustable thermostatKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Anti-drip functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Calc-clean functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Soft gripKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Maximum continuous flowKnown for one	36 g/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Minimum continuous flowKnown for one	0 g/min	Unknown — not stated by the source
Vertical steam functionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Ergonomic designKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Iron powerDiffers	2300 W	2600 W
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	220-240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	160 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	140 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	320 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.52 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	341 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	360 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.75 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More iron comparisons

All iron comparisons