HP Poly Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station vs Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT

Key differences

The HP Poly Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station has 134 h more standby time than the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT (300 h vs 166 h). The Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT has 3 h more talk time than the HP Poly Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station (21 h vs 18 h). The Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT has 5 - 95% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the HP Poly Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station (10 - 95% vs 5 - 95%). Only the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT has answering machine. Only the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT has Bluetooth.

• Product type
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:IP Phone
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:IP mobile phone
• Answering machine
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:No
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:Yes
• Display diagonal
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:15.5 cm (6.1")
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:6.1 cm (2.4")
• Bluetooth
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:No
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:Yes
• Power over Ethernet (PoE)
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:Yes
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:No
• Standby time
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:300 h
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:166 h
• Talk time
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:18 h
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:21 h
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • Rove Multi Cell DECT 1880-1900 MHz B4 Base Station:5 - 95%
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:10 - 95%