HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset vs Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT

Key differences

The HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset has 134 h more standby time than the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT (300 h vs 166 h). The HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset has 14 h more talk time than the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT (35 h vs 21 h). The Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT has 5 - 95% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset (10 - 95% vs 5 - 95%). Display diagonal: 5.08 cm (2") on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset, 6.1 cm (2.4") on the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT. Display resolution: 128 x 160 pixels on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset, 240 x 320 pixels on the Yealink W78P IP phone Black TFT.

• Display diagonal
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:5.08 cm (2")
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:6.1 cm (2.4")
• Display resolution
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:128 x 160 pixels
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:240 x 320 pixels
• Standby time
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:300 h
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:166 h
• Talk time
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:35 h
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:21 h
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:5 - 95%
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:10 - 95%
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:-10 - 55 °C
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:-10 - 50 °C
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:-40 - 70 °C
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:-30 - 70 °C
• Weight
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:162 g
  • W78P IP phone Black TFT:6.84 kg