HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset vs Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi

Key differences

The Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi has 5 - 95% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset (10 - 95% vs 5 - 95%). The HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset has 36 g more weight than the Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi (162 g vs 126 g). Product type: IP mobile phone on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset, IP Phone on the Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi. Display diagonal: 5.08 cm (2") on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset, 6.1 cm (2.4") on the Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi. Display resolution: 128 x 160 pixels on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset, 240 x 320 pixels on the Yealink AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi.

• Product type
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:IP mobile phone
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:IP Phone
• Display diagonal
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:5.08 cm (2")
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:6.1 cm (2.4")
• Display resolution
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:128 x 160 pixels
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:240 x 320 pixels
• Operating relative humidity (H-H)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:5 - 95%
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:10 - 95%
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:-10 - 55 °C
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:0 - 40 °C
• Storage temperature (T-T)
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:-40 - 70 °C
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:-30 - 70 °C
• Weight
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:162 g
  • AX83H IP phone Black TFT Wi-Fi:126 g