HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset

Key differences

The HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset has 10 more total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e) than the HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled (40 vs 30). The HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 43 mm more package width than the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset (223 mm vs 180 mm). The HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 162.8 mm more package depth than the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset (255 mm vs 92.2 mm). Product type: IP Phone on the HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled, IP mobile phone on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset. Display: IPS on the HP Poly Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled, TFT on the HP Poly Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset.

• Product type
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:IP Phone
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:IP mobile phone
• Display
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:IPS
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:TFT
• Display diagonal
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:7.11 cm (2.8")
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:5.08 cm (2")
• Display resolution
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:320 x 240 pixels
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:128 x 160 pixels
• Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:30
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:40
• Operating temperature (T-T)
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:0 - 40 °C
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:-10 - 55 °C
• Package width
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:223 mm
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:180 mm
• Package depth
  • Edge E100 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:255 mm
  • Rove 20 DECT Phone Handset:92.2 mm