Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA vs HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled

Add a product
  • 38specifications compared
  • 17differ
  • 21identical
  • 6known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 16 lines more lines quantity than the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled (24 lines vs 8 lines). The HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 0.8 more Bluetooth version than the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (5.0 vs 4.2). The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 40 mm more package width than the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled (263 mm vs 223 mm). Only the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has touchscreen. Display: LCD on the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, IPS on the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled.

  • Lines quantity
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:24 lines
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:8 lines
  • Display
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:LCD
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:IPS
  • Display diagonal
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:12.7 cm (5")
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:8.89 cm (3.5")
  • Display resolution
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:720 x 1280 pixels
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:320 x 240 pixels
  • Aspect ratio
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:16:9
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:4:3
  • Touchscreen
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Yes
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:No
  • Ethernet LAN interface type
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Gigabit Ethernet
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:Fast Ethernet
  • Bluetooth version
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:4.2
    • Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:5.0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled
44 specifications
Designidentical
Wall mountableKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Phone features1 differ
Lines quantityDiffers24 lines8 lines
Display5 differ
DisplayDiffersLCDIPS
Display diagonalDiffers12.7 cm (5")8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolutionDiffers720 x 1280 pixels320 x 240 pixels
Aspect ratioDiffers16:94:3
TouchscreenDiffersYesNo
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffersG.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBCG.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.722.1, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Network2 differ
Ethernet LAN interface typeDiffersGigabit EthernetFast Ethernet
Bluetooth versionDiffers4.25.0
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificates1 differ
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Compliance certificatesDiffersEAC, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CEEAC, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Package widthDiffers263 mm223 mm
Package depthDiffers243 mm278 mm
Package heightDiffers70 mm89 mm
Package weightDiffers1.59 kg300 g
Logistics data3 differ
Country of originDiffersTaiwanChina
Pallet gross weightDiffers310.2 kg357 kg
UNSPSC-codeDiffers4319151543191511
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneAndroid 9Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons