Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset

16specifications compared
11differ
5identical
36known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled has 19.7 more total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e) than the HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset (60 vs 40.3). The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled has 46 mm more package width than the HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset (222 mm vs 176 mm). The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled has 80 mm more package depth than the HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset (243 mm vs 163 mm). Handset type: Wired handset on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, Wireless handset on the HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset. Product colour: Black on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, White on the HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset.

Handset type
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:Wired handset
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:Wireless handset
Product colour
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:Black
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:White
Display
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:LCD
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:TFT
Display diagonal
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:12.7 cm (5")
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:6.1 cm (2.4")
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:60
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:40.3
Operating temperature (T-T)
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:0 - 40 °C
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:-10 - 55 °C
Package width
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:222 mm
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:176 mm
Package depth
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:243 mm
- Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset:163 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset
52 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly Rove 40 DECT Phone Handset View product
Design2 differ
Product typeKnown for one	IP Phone	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handset typeDiffers	Wired handset	Wireless handset
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Protection featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Drop proof
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Android 12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone featuresidentical
Lines quantityKnown for one	24 lines	Unknown — not stated by the source
Caller ID	Yes	Yes
Call forwardingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call holdKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call waitingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Display2 differ
DisplayDiffers	LCD	TFT
Display diagonalDiffers	12.7 cm (5")	6.1 cm (2.4")
Display resolutionKnown for one	720 x 1280 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	9:16	Unknown — not stated by the source
TouchscreenKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Backlight displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Audioidentical
SpeakerphoneKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Voice codecsKnown for one	G.722, G.729ab, G.711alaw, iLBC, G.711ulaw, OPUS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Ethernet LANKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN interface typeKnown for one	Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Wi-FiKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs	60	40.3
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-9 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Poweridentical
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Standby timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 h
Talk timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	18 h
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)	5 - 95%	5 - 95%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	0 - 40 °C	-10 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)	-40 - 70 °C	-40 - 70 °C
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Package widthDiffers	222 mm	176 mm
Package depthDiffers	243 mm	163 mm
Package heightDiffers	69 mm	44 mm
Package weight	300 g	300 g
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56.9 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	146.3 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	36.8 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	171 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	LAN (RJ-45)	Unknown — not stated by the source
HandsetKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of handles includedKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Stand includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffers	China, Taiwan	China
Pallet gross weight	357 kg	357 kg
UNSPSC-codeDiffers	43191515	43191606
Batteryidentical
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Built-in

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons