Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled

33specifications compared
7differ
26identical
8known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has 41 mm more package width than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled (263 mm vs 222 mm). The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has 1 mm more package height than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled (70 mm vs 69 mm). Only the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has Bluetooth. Aspect ratio: 9:16 on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, 16:9 on the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled. Package weight: 300 g on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, 1.25 kg on the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled.

Aspect ratio
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:9:16
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:16:9
Bluetooth
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:No
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:Yes
Package width
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:222 mm
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:263 mm
Package height
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:69 mm
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:70 mm
Package weight
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:300 g
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:1.25 kg
Country of origin
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:China, Taiwan
- CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:China

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled, CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled
41 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Android 12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display1 differ
Aspect ratioDiffers	9:16	16:9
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.722, G.729ab, G.711alaw, iLBC, G.711ulaw, OPUS	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Network1 differ
BluetoothDiffers	No	Yes
Security algorithmsKnown for one	HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.2
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	60	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Package widthDiffers	222 mm	263 mm
Package heightDiffers	69 mm	70 mm
Package weightDiffers	300 g	1.25 kg
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	China, Taiwan	China
Pallet gross weightKnown for one	357 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	43191515	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons