Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled

39specifications compared
1differ
38identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled has 4.4 more total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e) than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (60 vs 55.6).

Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:55.6
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:60

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled
39 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled View product
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs	55.6	60

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons