Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA

38specifications compared
2differ
36identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

Package weight: 300 g on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, 1.04 kg on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA. Country of origin: China, Taiwan on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, Taiwan on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA.

Package weight
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:300 g
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.04 kg
Country of origin
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:China, Taiwan
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Taiwan

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA
39 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA View product
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	55.6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers	300 g	1.04 kg
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	China, Taiwan	Taiwan

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons