Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA vs HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled

32specifications compared
10differ
22identical
9known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 12 lines more lines quantity than the HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled (24 lines vs 12 lines). The HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 34 mm more package width than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (256 mm vs 222 mm). The HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 95 mm more package depth than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (338 mm vs 243 mm). Only the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has touchscreen. Display: LCD on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, IPS on the HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled.

Lines quantity
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:24 lines
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:12 lines
Display
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:LCD
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:IPS
Display resolution
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:720 x 1280 pixels
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:800 x 480 pixels
Touchscreen
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Yes
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:No
Package width
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:222 mm
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:256 mm
Package depth
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:243 mm
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:338 mm
Package height
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:69 mm
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:89 mm
Package weight
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.04 kg
- Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:1.08 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled
41 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA View product	B HP Poly Edge E500 IP Phone and PoE-enabled View product
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Android 12	Unknown — not stated by the source
Phone features1 differ
Lines quantityDiffers	24 lines	12 lines
Display3 differ
DisplayDiffers	LCD	IPS
Display resolutionDiffers	720 x 1280 pixels	800 x 480 pixels
TouchscreenDiffers	Yes	No
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.722, G.729ab, G.711alaw, iLBC, G.711ulaw, OPUS	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.722.1, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Networkidentical
Security algorithmsKnown for one	HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Package widthDiffers	222 mm	256 mm
Package depthDiffers	243 mm	338 mm
Package heightDiffers	69 mm	89 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.04 kg	1.08 kg
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	Taiwan	China
Pallet gross weightKnown for one	357 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	43191515	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons