Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA vs HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA

Add a product
  • 38specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 29identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 41 mm more package width than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (263 mm vs 222 mm). The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 1 mm more package height than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (70 mm vs 69 mm). The HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has 0.55 kg more package weight than the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA (1.59 kg vs 1.04 kg). Only the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA has Bluetooth. Compatible operating systems: Android 12 on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, Android 9 on the HP Poly CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA.

  • Compatible operating systems
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Android 12
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Android 9
  • Aspect ratio
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:9:16
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:16:9
  • Bluetooth
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:No
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Yes
  • Package width
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:222 mm
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:263 mm
  • Package height
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:69 mm
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:70 mm
  • Package weight
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.04 kg
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.59 kg
  • Pallet gross weight
    • CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:357 kg
    • CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:310.2 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, CCX 500 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA
40 specifications
Performance1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersAndroid 12Android 9
Display1 differ
Aspect ratioDiffers9:1616:9
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffersG.722, G.729ab, G.711alaw, iLBC, G.711ulaw, OPUSG.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Network1 differ
BluetoothDiffersNoYes
Bluetooth versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.2
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffersRoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CEEAC, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Package widthDiffers222 mm263 mm
Package heightDiffers69 mm70 mm
Package weightDiffers1.04 kg1.59 kg
Logistics data1 differ
Pallet gross weightDiffers357 kg310.2 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons