Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA vs HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled

38specifications compared
2differ
36identical
1known for one product only

Key differences

Package weight: 1.04 kg on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, 300 g on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled. Country of origin: Taiwan on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, China, Taiwan on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled.

Package weight
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:1.04 kg
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:300 g
Country of origin
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA:Taiwan
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled:China, Taiwan

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA, CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled
39 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled GSA/TAA View product	B HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone with Open SIP and PoE-enabled View product
Technical detailsidentical
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60
Weight & dimensions1 differ
Package weightDiffers	1.04 kg	300 g
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	Taiwan	China, Taiwan

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons