Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled

28specifications compared
8differ
20identical
34known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 11 mm more package width than the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (233 mm vs 222 mm). The HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 19 mm more package depth than the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (262 mm vs 243 mm). The HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has 7 mm more package height than the HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled (69 mm vs 62 mm). Display diagonal: 7.11 cm (2.8") on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, 8.89 cm (3.5") on the HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled. Display resolution: 640 x 480 pixels on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, 320 x 240 pixels on the HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled.

Display diagonal
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:7.11 cm (2.8")
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolution
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:640 x 480 pixels
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:320 x 240 pixels
Package width
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:222 mm
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:233 mm
Package depth
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:243 mm
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:262 mm
Package height
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:69 mm
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:62 mm
Country of origin
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:China
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:China, Mexico
UNSPSC-code
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:43191515
- VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled:43191511

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled
62 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly VVX 350 6-Line IP Phone and PoE-enabled View product
Phone featuresidentical
Lines quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 lines
Call forwardingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call holdKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call transferKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Call waitingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Conference callKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Distinctive ringKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Do not disturb functionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
RedialingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Speed diallingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Caller IDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display2 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	7.11 cm (2.8")	8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	640 x 480 pixels	320 x 240 pixels
Audio1 differ
Comfort noise generation (CNG)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Voice activity detectionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Voice codecsDiffers	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729A, OPUS, Silk, iLBC	G.711, G.722, G.722.1, G.729ab, iLBC
Networkidentical
SyslogKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wi-FiKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 year(s)
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Known for one	30.5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
RJ-9 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL 60950-1/62368-1, CE Mark, CAN/CSA C22.2 No 60950-1/62368-1-1, EN 60950-1/62368-1, IEC 60950-1/62368-1, AS/NZS 60950-1
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FCC Part 15 (CFR 47) Class B ICES-003 Class B EN55032 Class B CISPR32 Class B VCCI Class B EN55024 EN61000-3-2; EN61000-3-3 NZ Telepermit Korea KCC3 UAE TRA Russia CU3 Brazil ANATEL3 Australia RCM South Africa ICASA3 Saudi Arabia CITC China CCC3 RoHS Complian TAA
Poweridentical
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 A
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	233 mm
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	62 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	262 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.04 kg
Package widthDiffers	222 mm	233 mm
Package depthDiffers	243 mm	262 mm
Package heightDiffers	69 mm	62 mm
Packaging contentidentical
AC adapter includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Cables includedKnown for one	LAN (RJ-45)	Unknown — not stated by the source
HandsetKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Stand includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data2 differ
Country of originDiffers	China	China, Mexico
UNSPSC-codeDiffers	43191515	43191511
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Android 12	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons