Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled

37specifications compared
12differ
25identical
6known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has 10.5 more total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e) than the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled (30.5 vs 20). The HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 1 mm more package width than the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (223 mm vs 222 mm). The HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has 35 mm more package depth than the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (278 mm vs 243 mm). Only the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled has Bluetooth. Display: LCD on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, IPS on the HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled.

Display
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:LCD
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:IPS
Display diagonal
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:7.11 cm (2.8")
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolution
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:640 x 480 pixels
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:320 x 240 pixels
Ethernet LAN interface type
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:Gigabit Ethernet
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:Fast Ethernet
Bluetooth
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:No
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:Yes
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:30.5
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:20
Package width
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:222 mm
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:223 mm
Package depth
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:243 mm
- Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled:278 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled
43 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly Edge E320 IP Phone and PoE-enabled View product
Designidentical
Wall mountableKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Phone featuresidentical
Lines quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 lines
Display3 differ
DisplayDiffers	LCD	IPS
Display diagonalDiffers	7.11 cm (2.8")	8.89 cm (3.5")
Display resolutionDiffers	640 x 480 pixels	320 x 240 pixels
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4:3
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729A, OPUS, Silk, iLBC	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.722, G.722.1, G.729ab, OPUS, iLBC
Network2 differ
Ethernet LAN interface typeDiffers	Gigabit Ethernet	Fast Ethernet
BluetoothDiffers	No	Yes
Bluetooth versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.0
Near Field Communication (NFC)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs	30.5	20
Certificates1 differ
Compliance certificatesDiffers	RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE	EAC, RoHS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Package widthDiffers	222 mm	223 mm
Package depthDiffers	243 mm	278 mm
Package heightDiffers	69 mm	89 mm
Logistics data1 differ
UNSPSC-codeDiffers	43191515	43191511
Performanceidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Android 12	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons