Product comparison · 2 ip phones

HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled vs HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled

36specifications compared
6differ
30identical
5known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has 25.1 more total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e) than the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled (55.6 vs 30.5). Only the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled has touchscreen. Display diagonal: 7.11 cm (2.8") on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, 12.7 cm (5") on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled. Display resolution: 640 x 480 pixels on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, 720 x 1280 pixels on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled. Country of origin: China on the HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, China, Taiwan on the HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled.

Display diagonal
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:7.11 cm (2.8")
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:12.7 cm (5")
Display resolution
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:640 x 480 pixels
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:720 x 1280 pixels
Touchscreen
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:No
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:Yes
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:30.5
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:55.6
Country of origin
- CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:China
- CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled:China, Taiwan

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled, CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled
41 specifications	A HP Poly CCX 350 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product	B HP Poly CCX 400 Business Media Phone for Microsoft Teams and PoE-enabled View product
Phone featuresidentical
Lines quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 lines
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	7.11 cm (2.8")	12.7 cm (5")
Display resolutionDiffers	640 x 480 pixels	720 x 1280 pixels
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9:16
TouchscreenDiffers	No	Yes
Audio1 differ
Voice codecsDiffers	G.711alaw, G.711ulaw, G.719, G.722, G.722.1, G.722.1C, G.729A, OPUS, Silk, iLBC	G.722, G.729ab, G.711alaw, iLBC, G.711ulaw, OPUS
Technical details1 differ
Total carbon footprint (kg of CO2e)Differs	30.5	55.6
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	ENERGY STAR	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data1 differ
Country of originDiffers	China	China, Taiwan

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More ip phone comparisons

All ip phone comparisons